![]() ![]() ![]() Nissan's center touchscreen looks and works the best of the bunch. Our fully loaded Nissan Rogue overdelivered on both design and technology. Shortcomings relate to the CR-V's dated infotainment system. The adjustable two-level floor in the cargo area also provides additional room. We also like the multiple configurations for its center console. It has one of the biggest cargo areas in the class. The CR-V's greatest attribute is its storage space. The Rogue is not currently available as a hybrid. Front-wheel-drive models are estimated at 29 or 30 mpg combined. In our experience, small-displacement turbocharged engines, like the CR-V's, tend to underperform in real-world fuel consumption.Īs for the Rogue, Nissan says you can expect 28 or 29 mpg combined with AWD, depending on trim level. The 2017 CR-V we purchased for a 40,000-mile long-term test averaged 27 mpg. All-wheel drive drops that figure to 29 mpg. The regular CR-V achieves a 30 mpg rating only when equipped with front-wheel drive. The Honda CR-V Hybrid AWD is rated at 38 mpg combined. CR-V hybrid models, the Toyota offers slightly better fuel economy. The all-wheel-drive hybrid gets 40 mpg combined. But remember that a 1 to 2 mpg difference at this level is negligible when it comes to annual fuel costs. The exceptions are non-hybrid all-wheel-drive versions that range from 27 to 29 mpg combined. Most Toyota RAV4 trim levels get an EPA estimate of 30 mpg combined. Opting for the CX-5's optional turbocharged engine and AWD drops you to 24 mpg combined. At best, the Mazda gets 28 mpg combined for front-wheel-drive and 26 mpg for all-wheel-drive models. Depending on configuration, each of these SUVs can reach that figure with the exception of the Mazda CX-5. The latest small SUVs can often get 30 mpg in combined city/highway driving, according to EPA fuel economy estimates. But the CR-V lacks some of the cool features the other test models had, such as a head-up display or a surround-view camera system. The Touring has a lot of features, including leather upholstery and a premium audio system. The Hybrid XSE doesn't have a few features that our other SUVs had, such as ventilated seats (they're available on the RAV4's top Limited trim level), but it's otherwise pretty well equipped.įinally, our top-line CR-V Touring AWD cost $35,870. It had a window sticker price of $35,625. We couldn't obtain a fully loaded model for testing so we got a RAV4 Hybrid in the XSE trim level. The Signature comes with a powerful turbocharged engine plus upgraded leather upholstery, ventilated front seats and a head-up display, among other features. The Mazda CX-5 we tested was a Signature trim level with AWD. The Platinum trim gets you features such as quilted leather upholstery, a digital gauge cluster, a head-up display, wireless Apple CarPlay smartphone integration and a surround-view camera system. Our fully loaded Rogue Platinum had all-wheel drive (AWD) and checked in at $38,660. You can find deals and offers on these and other SUVs at our SUV Deals Center. Notably, while we're using MSRPs for this comparison, discounts and incentives can make a big difference. The specific vehicles we tested were all well equipped with features. Like most in their class, each vehicle in this compact SUV comparison starts at around $26,000 and tops out in the mid- to high $30,000s.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |